Go to navigation Go to content
Toll-Free: (800) 606-1717
Phone: (248) 569-4646
Michigan Personal Injury, Car Accident,
& Medical Malpractice Lawyers
Call Now(800) 606-1717Free Consultation
Speak with Michigan’s Best Injury Lawyers with a No Fee Promise

Our top rated law firm has earned
the trust of Michigan injury victims
to win their cases since 1968.
Daniel Buckfire, Partner
Attorney & Author

Biomechanical Experts in Car Accident Cases

In recent years, defense attorneys in Michigan auto accident lawsuits have begun retaining "experts" in the field of biomechanical engineering to provide "expert testimony" that the forces of a particular auto accident were incapable of causing significant injury to the occupants. Typically, defense attorneys use these so called biomechanical experts to argue to a jury that a particular plaintiff could not have been injured in a low impact and/or low property damage accident. This new trend has emerged in numerous trial courts, not only in Michigan, but throughout the United States. Most often, these experts pop-up in cases where the Plaintiff has sustained an injury to the neck or back (such as a herniated disc) or in cases involving a traumatic brain injury (a/k/a closed head injury).

Essentially the biomechanical expert opines that based upon a specific Delta V (change in acceleration) or a specific amount of g force in the auto accident, an individual is incapable of being injured. In fact, many of these experts will testify that an auto accident cannot cause a herniated disc without a fracture to the spine. In support of their "opinions," the defense biomechanical experts routinely rely on a small body of literature involving human volunteers (mostly male), crash dummies, animals, and cadavers who are subjected to impact collisions on sleds and in crash tests.

Further compounding their flawed methodology is the biomechanical expert's seemingly intentional failure to consider significant variables in their calculations, such as changes in an occupant's physical characteristics, body position, seat position, pre-existing physical condition of the occupant, as well as the position and location of the headrest. The controlled studies upon which most biomechanical engineers rely on all involve mostly healthy men who were sitting in normal seated positions, head forward with a properly placed headrest. These staged collisions in no way replicate real world events or real world people involved in collisions.

The insurance industry has inundated the citizens of Michigan and the United States with propaganda claiming that our civil justice system is a lottery, and that rogue juries ignore the law and award uninjured Plaintiff's millions of dollars. This propaganda has resulted in the so-called "Tort Reform" movement in Michigan, and other states. Use of these "junk science" biomechanical experts prey upon this perception of greedy trial lawyers and plaintiffs. Fortunately, these efforts to inject "junk science" into motor vehicle accident litigation has not gone unchallenged and courts throughout the United States have overwhelmingly barred this type of testimony.

For example, the following decisions in Federal and State jurisdictions have recognized that scientifically unsound opinions of biomechanics are not admissible at trial. They include, but are not limited, to: Cromer v. Mulkey Enter., Inc., 562 S.E.2d 783 (Ga. Ct. App. 2002); Clemente v. Blumenberg, et al., 183 Misc.3d 923, 705 N.Y.S.2d 792 (1999); Mattek v. White, 695 So. 2d 942 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 4th Dist., 1997); Salerno v. Tudor, 2002 W.L. 120608 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002); Schultz v. Wells, 13 P.3d 846 (Colo. App. 2000); Smelser v. Norfolk So. Rywy. Co., 105 F.3d 299 (6th Dist.), cert. denied, 118 S.Ct. 67, 139 L. Ed. 2d 29 (1997; Suanez v. Egland, 801 A.2d 1186 (N.J. Super. 202); Titsworth v. Robinson, 252 Va. 151, 475 S.E.2d 261 (Va. 1996); Whiting v. Coultrip, 755 N.E.2d 494 (Ill. App. 2001).

Finally, it is also important to note that most defense biomechanical experts are professional witnesses and are particularly adept at deceiving juries into accepting their theories. Thus, a Defendant's attempt to introduce testimony from a biomechanical expert in any auto accident injury case should be strongly opposed. The experienced lawyers at Buckfire & Buckfire, P.C. have strongly and successfully fought to preclude this type of testimony from being introduced in auto accident cases.


DO I HAVE AN AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE CASE?

1-800-606-1717

Contact a Southfield, Michigan, auto accident attorney serving the greater Detroit area.



We represent Michigan car accident clients in Adrian, Ann Arbor, Battle Creek, Bay City, Birmingham, Bloomfield Township, Canton, Clinton Township, Dearborn, Detroit, Eastpointe, East Lansing, Farmington Hills, Ferndale, Flint, Garden City, Grand Rapids, Grosse Pointe, Hazel Park, Holland, Jackson, Kalamazoo, Kentwood, Lansing, Marquette, Midland, Monroe, Mount Clements, Muskegon, Novi, Oak Park, Okemos Owosso, Pontiac, Port Huron, Portage, Rochester, Roseville, Royal Oak, Saginaw, St. Clair Shores, Shelby Township, Southtgate, Southfield, Sterling Heights, Taylor, Troy, Utica, Warren, Waterford, Westland, Wyoming, Ypsilanti, Zeeland Alcona County, Alger County, Allegan County, Alpena County, Atrim County, Arenac County, Baraga County, Barry County, Bay County, Benzie County, Berrien County, Branch County, Calhoun County, Cass County, Charlevoix County, Cheboygan County, Chippewa County, Clare, County, Clinton County, Crawford County, Delta County, Dickinson County, Eaton County, Emmet County, Gladwin County, Genesee, Gogebic County, Grand Traverse County, Gratiot County, Hillsdale County, Houghton County, Huron County, Ingham County, Ionia County, Iosco County, Iron County, Isabella County, Jackson County, Kalamazoo County, Kalkaska County, Kent County, Keweenaw County, Lake County, Lapeer County, Leelanau County, Lenawee County, Livingston County, Luce County, Mackinac County, Macomb County, Manistee County, Marquette County, Mason County, Mecosta County, Menominee County, Midland County, Missaukee County, Montcalm County, Montmorency County, Muskegon County, Monroe County, Newaygo County, Oakland County, Oceana County, Ogemaw County ,Ontonagon County, Osceola County, Oscoda County, Otsego County, Presque Isle County, Ottawa County, Roscommon County, Saginaw County, Saint Joseph County, Sanilac County, Schoolcraft County, Shiawassee County, St. Clair County, Tuscola County, Van Buren County, Washtenaw County, Wayne County, Wexford County and all Michigan cities and counties.

Practice AreasSee All Practice Areas

Auto Accident »

Top rated Michigan car accident lawyers handling auto, truck, drunk driver, pedestrian, and bicycle accident cases.
Read All

Medical Malpractice »

Medical malpractice attorneys representing victims in cases against doctors, hospitals, and clinics in medical error and medical negligence lawsuits.
Read All

Motorcycle Accident »

Michigan motorcycle accident lawyers winning largest settlements for injured bikers and passengers.
Read All

Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect »

Michigan nursing home abuse and neglect lawyers handling cases involving wrongful death, bed sores, patient falls, and other injuries.
Read All

Wrongful Death »

Pursuing wrongful death lawsuits arising from fatal accidents, accidental death, and all cases under Michigan Wrongful Death Laws.
Read All

Dog Bite »

Michigan dog bite lawyers representing victims of dog attacks, including adults, children, postal workers, and utility workers.
Read All

Slip and Fall »

Michigan slip and fall accident lawyers handling injury cases involving ice and snow, wet floors, broken sidewalks, and other dangerous conditions.
Read All

Types of Personal Injury Cases »

Handling cases involving brain injury, spinal cord injury, poisonings, burn injuries, neck and back injuries, and all other injuries.
Read All